Understanding Natural Law

Mark Passio is an independent researcher and public speaker who is also very active in The Breakthrough Energy Movement, the Tesla Science Foundation and Free Your Mind Conference.

His website http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/ outlines his body of work.
Mark takes listeners on a journey of self-exploration while examining human consciousness and the way it relates to the universal problems which we currently face.

Mark joins Truth Connections to discuss satanism, natural law, the mindset of order followers, the enslavement system, what true enlightenment is, what the true great
work is and much more. This broadcast is sure to be an empowering presentation about how to recognize: truth and deception, emotional polarities, sovereignty and anarchy,
the difference between magic and sorcery, the basics of good and evil and the underlining agenda of manipulation while providing solutions we can all learn to empower
our lives. Also discussed will be natural law, universal law, free will, the laws of manifestation and the current ego driven mindset of our belief systems and its components.

Understanding Natural Law vs Artificial Rules

Define your terms, you will permit me again to say, or we shall never understand one another… ~ Voltaire

In order to maintain the “illusion of justice”, the so-called “courts” do place merit on definitions; if you do not supply definitions to what you are saying, “the court” most certainly will, and those definitions will most assuredly NOT be to your benefit[1].

In your ‘natural state’ you are a ‘sovereign without subjects’, subject only to the law of nature[2]…

“The natural liberty[3] of man[4] is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.” ~ Samuel Adams

…UNLESS, of course, you have trespassed on some one else’s natural rights[5], or have given your consent[6], express, implied, or tacit[7], to be governed by another, or others, in exchange for legal benefits and franchises. The most pronounced among these “benefits” is protection of your “rights”[8].

“To find out about natural persons[9], go live among them; to find out about citizens, consult a lawyer! Obvious as this may be, confusion about the categories of natural and of artificial persons is rife.” ~ Frank Van Dun, Ph.D., Dr.Jur. – Senior lecturer Philosophy of Law

[1] “…through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you…”

[2] “Natural law is that body of rules which Man is able to discover by the use of his reason.” ~ Hugo Grotius

“The natural law is defined by Burlamaqui to be “a rule which so necessarily agrees with the nature and state of man that, without observing its maxims, the peace and happiness of society can never be preserved.” And he says “that these are called “natural laws” because a knowledge of them may be attained merely by the light of reason, from the fact of their essential agreeableness with the constitution of human nature…” ~ A Dictionary of the Law (Black’s 1st c. 1891), page 694

“There is in fact a true law – namely, right reason – which is in accordance with nature, applies to all men, and is unchangeable and eternal.” ~ Cicero

Law of nature, is a rule of conduct arising out of the natural relations of human beings established by the Creator, and existing prior to any positive precept. Thus it is a law of nature, that one man should not injure another, and murder and fraud would be crimes, independent of any prohibition from a supreme power. ~ Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language

“The law of nature is superior in obligation to any other. It is binding in all countries and at all times. No human laws are valid if opposed to this, and all which are binding derive their authority either directly or indirectly from it.” ~ Institutes of American Law by John Bouvier, 1851, Part I, Title II, No. 9

[3] Natural liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men. Burlamaqui, c. 3, § 15; 1 Bl. Comm. 125 ~ A Dictionary of the Law (Black’s 1st c. 1891), pg. 716

“Natural liberty, consists in the power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, EXCEPT FROM THE LAWS OF NATURE. It is a state of exemption from the control of others, and from positive laws and the institutions of social life.” ~ Noah Webster

This liberty is abridged by voluntarily submitting one’s self to the dominion of a government not founded on the Law of Nature.

[4] Once someone consents to be governed he is, technically, no longer a “man” [human], but is now considered a “person”.

Homo vocabulum est naturae; persona juris civilis. Man (homo) is a term of nature; person (persona) of civil law. ~ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (c.1990), page 736

[5] TRES’PASS, n. In law, violation of another’s rights… ~ Noah Webster

FOR’FEITURE, n. …the losing of some right [just claim]…by an offense, crime, breach of condition or other act. ~ Noah Webster

[6] Consensus facit legem. Consent makes the law. ~ Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary, page 1638; Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (c.1990), page 305)

[7] Tacit consent is consent by silence, or not interposing an objection [rebuttal]. So we say, a tacit agreement or covenant of men to live under a particular government, when no objection or opposition [rebuttal] is made; a tacit surrender of a part of our natural rights… ~ Noah Webster

[8] Protectio trahit subjectionem, subjectio projectionem. Protection draws to it subjection, subjection, protection. The protection of an individual by government is on condition of his submission to the laws, and such submission on the other hand entitles the individual to the protection of the government. ~ Maxim of law, Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (c.1990), page 1223

[9] NATURAL PERSONS. Such as are formed by nature, as distinguished from artificial persons, or corporations, formed by human laws for purposes of society and government. Wharton. ~ A Dictionary of the Law (Black’s 1st c. 1891), pg. 802

Rights vs Privileges

“A RIGHT is something that you have inherently. It is not given to you by anyone. A right is something that is granted to you by God, the creator, or by a higher authority…or in other words….whoever AUTHORED YOU. A right is not bestowed to you by a person, government, political organization or proclaimed authority. You do not have CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS…..the Constitution merely proclaims…, exalts and declares the rights YOU ALREADY HAVE by the very fact that you were born. This is an important distinction. A RIGHT is genuine. It is self-evident. A privilege is the complete opposite of a RIGHT. A privilege is not a right. You don’t have the privilege of free speech, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH. Once you understand this principle, clarified by our founding fathers, you should then do yourself a favor and reread the BILL OF RIGHTS and remember this: it was not called the BILL OF PRIVELEGES for a reason.” – Claudia Pavonis

Lawful vs Legal


Law deals in what is right and wrong, whereas legal is a framework of rules that only has the force of Law with the consent of the governed. To break legislation is essentially a breach of contact. If that contract was fraudulently forced or coerced it is unlawful, null and void. “Fraud vitiates all.” Acts, statutes, codes and policies therefore cannot be forced outside of the scope of their own framework.


The Law is clear, traveling on the public highways is a right devoid of any statuary obligations, need of licenses or permits, or any other form of permission from the state.

“The navigable waters leading into the Mississippi and St. Lawrence,*and the carrying places between the same, shall be common highways and forever free, as well to the inhabitants of the said territory as to the citizens of the United States, and those of any other States that may be admitted into the confederacy, without any tax, impost, or duty therefor.” [Northwest Ordinances, Article 4]

“Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen.” Escobedo vs. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27

“The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse-drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but a common right which he has under his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Slusher vs. Safety Coach Transit Co., 229 Ky 731, 17 SW2d 1012, and affirmed by the Supreme Court in Thompson vs. Smith 154 S.E. 579.

“Users of the highway for transportation of persons and property for hire may be subjected to special regulations not applicable to those using the highway for public purposes.” Richmond Baking Co. vs. Department of Treasury 18 N.E. 2d 788.

“Constitutionally protected liberty includes…the right to travel…” 13 Cal Jur 3d p.416

In California, a license is defined as “A permit, granted by an appropriate governmental body, generally for a consideration, to a person or firm, or corporation to pursue some occupation or to carry on some business subject to regulation under the police power.” Rosenblatt vs. California 158 P2d 199, 300.

“Operation of a motor vehicle upon public streets and highways is not a mere privilege but is a RIGHT or liberty protected by the guarantees of Federal and State constitutions.” Adams vs. City of Pocatello 416 P2d 46

“One who DRIVES an automobile is an operator within meaning of the Motor Vehicle Act.” Pontius vs. McClean 113 CA 452

“The word ‘operator’ shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation.” Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.833

“A citizen may have the right, under the 14th amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to travel and transport his property upon the public highways by auto vehicle, but he has no right to make the highways his place of business by using them as a common carrier for hire; such use being a privilege which may be granted or withheld by the state in its discretion, without violating the due process or equal protection clauses.” In Re Graham 93 Cal App 88.

“The license charge imposed by the motor vehicle act is an excise or privilege tax, established for the purpose of revenue in order to provide a fund for roads while under the dominion of the state authorities, it is not a tax imposed as a rental charge or a toll charge for the use of the highways owned and controlled by the state.” – PG&E vs. State Treasurer, 168 Cal 420.

“The same principles of law are applicable to them as to other vehicles upon the highway. It is therefore, the adaptation and use, rather than the form or kind of conveyance that concerns the courts.” Indiana Springs Co. vs. Brown, 74 N.E. 615.

“The automobile is not inherently dangerous.” Moore vs. Roddie, 180 P. 879, Blair vs. Broadmore 93 S.E. 632.

“The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning of a livlihood in modern life requires us in the interest of realism to conclude that the RIGHT to use an automobile on the public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the meaning of the Constitutional guarantees…Berberian vs. Lussier (1958) 139 A2d 869, 872

“Truck driver’s failure to be licensed as chauffeur does not establish him or his employer as negligent as a matter of law with respect to accident in which driver was involved, in absence of any evidence that lack of such license had any casual or causal connection with the accident…Bryant vs. Tulare Ice Co. (1954) 125 CA 2d 566

“The RIGHT of the citizen to drive on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts.” People vs. Horton 14 Cal. App. 3rd 667 (1971)

“The RIGHT to TRAVEL on the public highways is a constitutional RIGHT.” Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss. 12 So 2d 784, 787.

“The right to travel is part of the ‘liberty’ that a citizen cannot be deprived of without due process of law.” Kent vs. Dulles 357 U.S. 116, U.S. vs. Laub 385 U.S. 475

“A citizen may have the right, under the 14th amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to travel and transport his property upon the public highways by auto vehicle, but he has NO right to make the highways his place of business by using them as a common carrier for hire; such use being a privilege which may be granted or withheld by the state in its discretion, without violating the due process or equal protection clauses.” In Re Graham 93 Cal App 88.

“CVC 17459. The acceptance by a resident of this state of a certificate of ownership or a certificate of registration of any motor vehicle or any renewal thereof, issued under the provisions of this code, shall constitute the CONSENT by the person that service of summons may be made upon him within or without this state, whether or not he is then a resident of this state, in any action brought in the courts of this state upon a cause of action arising in this state out of the ownership or operation of the vehicle.” California Vehicle Code

“CVC 17460. The acceptance or retention by a resident of this state of a driver’s license issued pursuant to the provisions of this code, shall constitute the CONSENT of the person that service of summons may be made upon him within or without this state, whether or not he is then a resident of this state, in any action brought in the courts of this state upon a cause of action arising in this state out of his operation of a motor vehicle anywhere within this state.” California Vehicle Code

“When a person applies for and accepts a license or permit, he in effect knows the limitations of it, and takes it at the risk and consequences of transgression.” Shevlin-Carpenter Co. vs. Minnesota, 218 U.S. 57.

Eustace Mullins – Court Procedures and the Law

Eustace Clarence Mullins, Jr. (March 9, 1923 – February 2, 2010) was a populist American political writer, biographer. His most famous work is The Secrets of The Federal Reserve. Along with Nesta Webster, he is generally regarded as one of the most influential authors in the genre of conspiracism.

Eustace Clarence Mullins, Jr. was born in Roanoke, Virginia, the third child of Eustace Clarence Mullins (1899–1961) and his wife Jane Katherine Muse (1897–1971). His father was a salesman in a retail clothing store.

Eustace Mullins was educated at Washington and Lee University, New York University, the University of North Dakota and the Institute of Contemporary Arts (Washington, D.C.)

In December 1942, at Charlottesville, Virginia he enlisted in the military as a Warrant Officer. He was a veteran of the United States Army Air Forces, with thirty-eight months active service during World War II.

Mullins frequently visited poet Ezra Pound during his period of incarceration in St. Elizabeths Hospital for the Mentally Ill in Washington, D.C. between 1946 and 1959. According to Mullins it was Pound who set him on the course of research that led to his writing The Secrets of The Federal Reserve

Mullins was a researcher at the Library of Congress in 1950 and worked with Senator Joseph McCarthy investigating Communist Party funding sources.He later stated that he believed McCarthy had “started to turn the tide against world communism”. Shortly after his first book came out in 1952, he was discharged by the Library of Congress.

In the 1950s, Mullins wrote for Conde McGinley’s newspaper Common Sense, which promoted the second edition of his book on the Federal Reserve, entitled The Federal Reserve Conspiracy (1954). Around this time, he also wrote for Lyrl Clark Van Hyning’s Chicago-based newsletter, Women’s Voice. In 1995, he was writing for Criminal Politics. Around the end of his life, he would write for Willis Carto’s magazine Barnes Review.

Mullins lived in Staunton, Virginia, in the house on Madison Place where he grew up, from the mid 1970s through the end of his life.