4 Secrets of the Legal Industry

4 Secrets of the Legal Industry

Most judgments are not merely voidable, but are in fact VOID JUDGMENTS. They can be vacated; made to go away (Although, it is an up hill battle, much like pushing a rope). Rarely has any authenticated evidence, competent fact witness, or even a claim been put before a court and on the record.

Defective affidavits, hearsay as evidence and no stated damages are but a few elements that rob the court of subject matter jurisdiction (at last count there are 22 elements that deprive the court of SMJ). Some of the elements are: denial of due process, denial of meaningful access to court, fraud upon the court, and fraud upon the court by the court.

(Although these pages are aimed primarily towards debt, credit card debt, the principals set forth herein apply to virtually all civil and criminal cases.)

Common pleas such as “open account” or “account stated” are often used in place of, and sometimes in conjunction with, breach of contract. To file under breach a contract would require that they bring in the signed contract, agreement, or note. They don’t bring in a contract, they bring in the “terms of agreement” which has no signature or persons name on it, a template that could apply to anyone.

These are just some of the tools used by debt collectors (credit card debt collectors in particular) and their counsel to perpetrate a fraud upon the court, with or without the courts cooperation or complicity.

At the same time, courts, almost as a rule, openly display a bitter and venomous hatred of pro se / pro per litigants. So don’t expect the courts to just roll over and give you what you demand without a battle. It doesn’t matter to them that you are right, it matters only that you are pro se; an inferior, low life being, and the courts have a position and the income of their brotherhood to protect. This attitude by the courts and Bar authorized attorneys tends to support the position expressed by Bill Bauer from CreditWrench.com: “There’s more value in being a pain in the arse than in being right.”

These are the four secrets:

1. Courts of general, limited, or inferior jurisdiction have no inherent judicial power.*

Courts of general, limited, or inferior jurisdiction get their jurisdiction from one source and one source only: SUFFICIENT PLEADINGS.
Someone before the court must tell the court what its jurisdiction is.
Without pleadings sufficient to empower the court to act, that court cannot have judicial capacity.
No judge has the power to determine whether he has jurisdiction. He does have the duty to tell when he does not.

….What this means to you is that no court can declare that it has the legal power to hear or decide cases, i.e. jurisdiction. Jurisdiction must be proved and on the record. Without sufficient pleadings, without jurisdiction, no court can issue a judgment that isn’t void ab initio, void from the beginning, void on its face, a nullity, without force and effect.

2. We have a common law system.

No statute, no rule, or no law means what it says as it is written.
Only the holding tells you what it means.
The statute means what the highest court of competent jurisdiction has ruled and determined that the statute means in their most recent ruling.

….What this means to you is that courts are governed/ruled by case law, what has been determined before, what the highest court of competent jurisdiction has said the law is, means. It is called the Doctrine of Precedent. This doctrine is so powerful that it can kill and has. A family in Florida has become quite familiar with this doctrine when they tried for 15 years to prevent feeding tubes from being removed from their daughter who was in a vegetative state.

3. Attorneys CANNOT testify.

Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are never facts before the court.

….What this means to you is that no attorney can state a fact before the court. This was more than adequately pointed out in 2000 when thousands of Florida ballots were taken before the U.S. Supreme Court, without even so much as one competent fact witness. Without a witness the court could not see the ballots, the ballots were not before the court, and the ballots could not be introduced as evidence.

4. Before any determination, there must be a court of complete or competent jurisdiction.

There must be two parties with capacity to be there.
There must be subject matter jurisdiction.
Appearance or testimony of a competent fact witness.

….What this means to you is that without jurisdiction, complete jurisdiction, no court can issue a judgment that isn’t void, a nullity, without force or effect, on its face and in fact.

*”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” U.S. Const. art. III, § 1, cl. 1.

by Jaime Barker

Advertisements

Lawful Travel Requires No Permission

“Everyone behind the wheel of their privately traveled-in automobiles has absolutely no requirement to register their cars with the Dept. of Motor Vehicles (DMV) in ANY state, unless they are engaged in a professional driving capacity that limited to providing transportation in exchange for revenue. The only reason people do register their autos is by threat of violence by the racketeering enterprises.

Lastly, lest anyone reading this give me the worn-out argument that because of the routine hand-over to the DMV of the title documents of every new car sold by every dealership (called the Manufacturer’s Certificate of Origin, or …Statement of Origin, MCO or MSO, respectively), this creates a lawful ownership of the “vehicles” by the DMV, is only valid if one accepts the notion that the DMV rightfully acquired the property for valuable consideration — which they don’t (in spite of rumor that the dealers get paid for the illegal transfer of such docs by the DMV).

Such surreptitious transfers to the DMV of the title documents of autos sold, in conspiracy with the dealers constitutes illegal conversions or theft by deception from the actual automobile buyers. Believing this scam purports to claim its rationale is due to the 1933 bankruptcy of the corporate United States, in no way subjugates the people of any state into compromising the sovereignty they inherently possess — by stealing their attempts to acquire property using one only medium of exchange permitted to circulate as money, regardless of the debt instruments they are (i.e. FRNs).” – Robyna Choleton

Understanding Natural Law

Mark Passio is an independent researcher and public speaker who is also very active in The Breakthrough Energy Movement, the Tesla Science Foundation and Free Your Mind Conference.

His website http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/ outlines his body of work.
Mark takes listeners on a journey of self-exploration while examining human consciousness and the way it relates to the universal problems which we currently face.

Mark joins Truth Connections to discuss satanism, natural law, the mindset of order followers, the enslavement system, what true enlightenment is, what the true great
work is and much more. This broadcast is sure to be an empowering presentation about how to recognize: truth and deception, emotional polarities, sovereignty and anarchy,
the difference between magic and sorcery, the basics of good and evil and the underlining agenda of manipulation while providing solutions we can all learn to empower
our lives. Also discussed will be natural law, universal law, free will, the laws of manifestation and the current ego driven mindset of our belief systems and its components.

Understanding Natural Law vs Artificial Rules

Define your terms, you will permit me again to say, or we shall never understand one another… ~ Voltaire

In order to maintain the “illusion of justice”, the so-called “courts” do place merit on definitions; if you do not supply definitions to what you are saying, “the court” most certainly will, and those definitions will most assuredly NOT be to your benefit[1].

In your ‘natural state’ you are a ‘sovereign without subjects’, subject only to the law of nature[2]…

“The natural liberty[3] of man[4] is to be free from any superior power on Earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but only to have the law of nature for his rule.” ~ Samuel Adams

…UNLESS, of course, you have trespassed on some one else’s natural rights[5], or have given your consent[6], express, implied, or tacit[7], to be governed by another, or others, in exchange for legal benefits and franchises. The most pronounced among these “benefits” is protection of your “rights”[8].

“To find out about natural persons[9], go live among them; to find out about citizens, consult a lawyer! Obvious as this may be, confusion about the categories of natural and of artificial persons is rife.” ~ Frank Van Dun, Ph.D., Dr.Jur. – Senior lecturer Philosophy of Law
______________________________
DEFINITIONS & CITES

[1] “…through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you…”

[2] “Natural law is that body of rules which Man is able to discover by the use of his reason.” ~ Hugo Grotius

“The natural law is defined by Burlamaqui to be “a rule which so necessarily agrees with the nature and state of man that, without observing its maxims, the peace and happiness of society can never be preserved.” And he says “that these are called “natural laws” because a knowledge of them may be attained merely by the light of reason, from the fact of their essential agreeableness with the constitution of human nature…” ~ A Dictionary of the Law (Black’s 1st c. 1891), page 694

“There is in fact a true law – namely, right reason – which is in accordance with nature, applies to all men, and is unchangeable and eternal.” ~ Cicero

Law of nature, is a rule of conduct arising out of the natural relations of human beings established by the Creator, and existing prior to any positive precept. Thus it is a law of nature, that one man should not injure another, and murder and fraud would be crimes, independent of any prohibition from a supreme power. ~ Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language

“The law of nature is superior in obligation to any other. It is binding in all countries and at all times. No human laws are valid if opposed to this, and all which are binding derive their authority either directly or indirectly from it.” ~ Institutes of American Law by John Bouvier, 1851, Part I, Title II, No. 9

[3] Natural liberty is the right which nature gives to all mankind of disposing of their persons and property after the manner they judge most consistent with their happiness, on condition of their acting within the limits of the law of nature, and so as not to interfere with an equal exercise of the same rights by other men. Burlamaqui, c. 3, § 15; 1 Bl. Comm. 125 ~ A Dictionary of the Law (Black’s 1st c. 1891), pg. 716

“Natural liberty, consists in the power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, EXCEPT FROM THE LAWS OF NATURE. It is a state of exemption from the control of others, and from positive laws and the institutions of social life.” ~ Noah Webster

This liberty is abridged by voluntarily submitting one’s self to the dominion of a government not founded on the Law of Nature.

[4] Once someone consents to be governed he is, technically, no longer a “man” [human], but is now considered a “person”.

Homo vocabulum est naturae; persona juris civilis. Man (homo) is a term of nature; person (persona) of civil law. ~ Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (c.1990), page 736

[5] TRES’PASS, n. In law, violation of another’s rights… ~ Noah Webster

FOR’FEITURE, n. …the losing of some right [just claim]…by an offense, crime, breach of condition or other act. ~ Noah Webster

[6] Consensus facit legem. Consent makes the law. ~ Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary, page 1638; Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (c.1990), page 305)

[7] Tacit consent is consent by silence, or not interposing an objection [rebuttal]. So we say, a tacit agreement or covenant of men to live under a particular government, when no objection or opposition [rebuttal] is made; a tacit surrender of a part of our natural rights… ~ Noah Webster

[8] Protectio trahit subjectionem, subjectio projectionem. Protection draws to it subjection, subjection, protection. The protection of an individual by government is on condition of his submission to the laws, and such submission on the other hand entitles the individual to the protection of the government. ~ Maxim of law, Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition (c.1990), page 1223

[9] NATURAL PERSONS. Such as are formed by nature, as distinguished from artificial persons, or corporations, formed by human laws for purposes of society and government. Wharton. ~ A Dictionary of the Law (Black’s 1st c. 1891), pg. 802