The Law by Frederic Bastiat

“In The Law, Bastiat says “each of us has a natural right – from God – to defend his person, his liberty, and his property”. The State is a “substitution of a common force for individual forces” to defend this right. The law becomes perverted when it is used to violate the rights of the individual, when it punishes one’s right to defend himself again a collective effort of others to legislatively enact laws which basically have the same effect of plundering.”

“Justice has precise limits but philanthropy is limitless and government can grow endlessly when that becomes its function. The resulting statism is “based on this triple hypothesis: the total inertness of mankind, the omnipotence of the law, and the infallibility of the legislator”. The relationship between the public and the legislator becomes “like the clay to the potter”. Bastiat says, “I do not dispute their right to invent social combinations, to advertise them, to advocate them, and to try them upon themselves, at their own expense and risk. But I do dispute their right to impose these plans upon us by law – by force – and to compel us to pay for them with our taxes”.

The full essay can be read here: The Law by Frederic Bastiat

What is/are Natural Law and Natural Rights?

“The law of nature is superior in obligation to any other. It is binding in all countries and at all times. No human laws are valid if opposed to this, and all which are binding derive their authority either directly or indirectly from it.” ~ Institutes of American Law by John Bouvier, 1851, Part I, Title II, No. 9

I am a natural man/woman, defined as, “Such as are formed by nature, as distinguished from artificial persons, or corporations, formed by human laws for purposes of society and government.” Wharton. ~ A Dictionary of the Law (Black’s 1st c. 1891), pg. 802

Each of us has a natural right [a “just claim”] – from the Creator – to defend his person, his liberty, and his property. These are the three basic requirements of life, and the preservation of any one of them is completely dependent upon the preservation of the other two. ~ The Law by Frederic Bastiat

Natural liberty, consists in the power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature. It is a state of exemption from the control of others, and from positive laws and the institutions of social life. ~ Webster’s 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language

“The natural law is defined by Burlamaqui to be “a rule which so necessarily agrees with the nature and state of man that, without observing its maxims, the peace and happiness of society can never be preserved.” And he says “that these are called “natural laws” because a knowledge of them may be attained merely by the light of reason, from the fact of their essential agreeableness with the constitution of human nature…” ~ A Dictionary of the Law (Black’s 1st c. 1891), page 69

Strawman – The Nature of the Cage

Strawman – The Nature of the Cage takes an in-depth look at the Legal Fiction, Lawful and Legal, debt collectors and modern day Police. Offering knowledge on how to lawfully deal with any kind of authority if you haven’t broken any laws.

This is the cage we live in and only when you realise you are in one, you can set yourself free.

Your Strawman is a fictitious legal entity, created at birth through your birth certificate. This is done to dupe you later in life into thinking that you are the legal entity and not you. Then imaginary costs and penalties are imposed on the Strawman, and you, thinking you are it, pay them. Costs and penalties such as Income Tax, Council Tax, Inheritance Tax, Capital-Gains Tax, Road Tax, Import Tax, Value-Added Tax, Fuel Levy, Loan Interest’, Bank Charges and anything else that full-time professionals can think up and are confident that you will not notice that you never agreed to pay and don’t need to pay. Costs that simply don’t apply to the human you. The deception is done through the manipulation of words and language. For example a human name looks something like this: Jack: of the family Robinson or Jack Robinson. A fictitious legal entity or Strawman name looks like this: MR JACK ROBINSON. When a name is prefixed with Mr, Mrs or Miss, or capitalised, that is not you that is your Strawman. Since you are not your Strawman, you don’t have to pay its costs. You just think they are applying the costs to you because it looks like your name but your name in capitals is not you.

Did You Know You’re A Criminal?

Please note: these are FACTS, not theories. Attention “Freemen on the Land/Sovereignty guru’s, Sovereign-citizens, patriots, humanity in general etc…….

1. If you use or claim to use/own the NAME you think is yours but isn’t because it was GIVEN to the CROWN CORPORATION/church/state by your parents at birth?

2. If you claim OWNERSHIP of anything REGISTERED because ALL things/people REGISTERED are PROPERTY OF THE CROWN.

3. You are automatically deemed a thief if you claim ANYTHING/EVERYTHING that has the NAME you claim fraudulently as yours on a REGISTRATION/OWNERSHIP and why COURTS and POLICE can and will “steal” what you think are your belongings but aren’t and actually are only reclaiming what was willfully GIVEN to the CROWN, their master. A BIRTH CERTIFICATE CANNOT be used for IDENTIFICATION and ANYONE can ORDER a COPY of YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE with minimal information.

4. You are a morally and sexually depraved criminal if you carry a LICENSE of any kind. License comes from the word “Licentious” and it has proof of your FALSE IMPERSONATION NAME you claim in fraud on it.

5. The courts have YOU automatically in DISHONOUR if you claim the NAME you think is you and you become SURETY for the BOND created in that NAME called a BIRTH CERTIFICATE and you do so WILFULLY in ignorance. JOINDER/LIABILITY on YOU can only be created when YOU claim THEIR legal NAME that THEY, the CROWN owns and NO COURT can touch you if you don’t. The Name is the pin on the hand grenade that THEY are terrified of, so pull it.

6. Only BAR members (Lawyers/judges) have RIGHT of COPYRIGHT use to maintain their “honour” in the courtroom and why those claiming to be a NAME REPRESENTING “themselves” CANNOT be heard because YOU are deemed DEAD; Dead men tell no tales.

7. All bank accounts, mortgages, loans, businesses, children, MARRIAGES/DIVORCES etc. REGISTERED/CREATED in the NAME you think is you are actually PROPERTY of the CROWN and any attempt to claim them is a willful and ignorant ACT of FRAUD and all things contained within these CONTRACTS are CHURCH/STATE/CROWN PROPERTY.

8. All IDENTIFICATION created from the BIRTH CERTIFICATE NAME you think is yours is FALSE IMPERSONATION and FALSE IDENTITY using the PROPERTY of the CROWN without permission and is a CAPITAL OFFENSE. Anyone claiming to be a NON-BAR member TITLE such as a Police Officer is actually FALSE IMPERSONATION two-fold because they don’t have RIGHT OF COPYRIGHT USE like everyone else.

9. This FRAUD from the CROWN CORPORATION is EASILY dispelled and REVERSED by exposing the CROWN CORPORATION’s (owners thereof) INTENT to DECEIVE/AID AND ABET humanity into FRAUD via ignorance of these CONTRACT facts!………………..

From Kate Rene

What is Legal is Not Necessarily Lawful

That which is lawful is right, just and moral.

That which is legal is permitted by the State (conformity to the rules within a fictional jurisdiction) applied to men and women who have abandoned their freedom in return for protection (citizenship).

As is clear to see, that which is lawful is not necessarily legal. To judge what is right by whether it is legal is to work on blind faith that the State is run by honourable people. If you require a framework of legislation (pertaining to legal) to conclude right from wrong, you lack a basic grasp of morality. And someone who lacks morality can not be expected to do that which is right, e.g., Lawful.

To engage in that which is Lawful is to exercise your free will in a manner that violates no other. To engage in that which is legal without a thought to what is moral, is to entrust the unscrupulous, the self serving, the psychotic and the duplicitous (politicians) to dictate your actions, forgoing your own discernment.

To reference legislation as the source of validation in support of an action is a fallacy when government can create out of thin air any dictate it desires to fit a preexisting agenda, devoid of moral, just or righteous attributes. Obedience to the dictates of politicians does not guarantee rightful action, it does however guarantee a level of servitude.

Lawful and legal therefore are the antithesis of each other.

What your ‘NAME’ means to the judicial system

The way your name is written indicates your status under Roman, and thus Corporate Maritime Law..
There were three changes of state or condition attended with different consequences, maxima, media, and minima.
The greatest, CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA, involved the loss of liberty, citizenship, and family (e.g. being made a slave or prisoner of war). The next change of state,
Capitis DIminutio Media, consisted of a loss of citizenship and family without any forfeiture of personal liberty.
capitis dIminutio minima, consisted of a person ceasing to belong to a particular family, without loss of liberty or citizenship.

Blacks Law Dictionary provides the following definition:

Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status) In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications.

capitis diminutio minima (meaning a minimum loss of status) – The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man’s family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered.

Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of status) – A lessor or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.

CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA (meaning a maximum loss of status) – The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.

Capite. – Lat. By the head
Diminutio. Lat. In civil law. Diminution; a taking away; loss or deprivation

No Victim = No Crime

“All laws which are repugnant to the constitution are null and void.” – Marbury v Madison

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional Rights.” Snerer vs. Cullen, 481 F. 946

“An…officer violates the Constitution he ceases to represent the government.” Brookfield County V. Stuart, 234 F. Supp. 94.

“No public policy of a state can be allowed to override the positive guarantees of the U.S. Constitution.”16 Am.Jur. (2nd), Const. Law, Sect. 7R

“This Constitution, AND the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof;…shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in EVERY State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution…” The Art. 6 of the U. S. Constitution

“For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party. There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional Rights. Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945

“The assertion of federal Rights, when plainly and reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice.” Davis v. Wechsler, 263 U.S. 22, 24